I was wondering about very few HITs in this squid installation, and did some checking: access.log: 1401203150.334 1604 10.1.10.121 TCP_MISS/200 718707 GET http://l5.yimg.com/av/moneyball/ads/0-1399331780-5313.jpg - ORIGINAL_DST/66.196.65.174 image/jpeg 1401203186.100 1327 10.1.10.121 TCP_MISS/200 718707 GET http://l5.yimg.com/av/moneyball/ads/0-1399331780-5313.jpg - ORIGINAL_DST/66.196.65.174 image/jpeg cache.log: 2014/05/27 14:52:12 kid1| Starting Squid Cache version 3.4.5-20140514-r13135 for i686-pc-linux-gnu... 2014/05/27 14:52:12 kid1| Process ID 7477 2014/05/27 14:52:12 kid1| Process Roles: worker 2014/05/27 14:52:12 kid1| With 1024 file descriptors available 2014/05/27 14:52:12 kid1| Initializing IP Cache... 2014/05/27 14:52:12 kid1| DNS Socket created at [::], FD 7 2014/05/27 14:52:12 kid1| DNS Socket created at 0.0.0.0, FD 8 2014/05/27 14:52:12 kid1| Adding nameserver 127.0.0.1 from /etc/resolv.conf 2014/05/27 14:52:12 kid1| Logfile: opening log daemon:/tmp/var/log/squid/access.log 2014/05/27 14:52:12 kid1| Logfile Daemon: opening log /tmp/var/log/squid/access.log 2014/05/27 14:52:12 kid1| Logfile: opening log daemon:/tmp/var/log/squid/store.log 2014/05/27 14:52:12 kid1| Logfile Daemon: opening log /tmp/var/log/squid/store.log 2014/05/27 14:52:12 kid1| Swap maxSize 0 + 2097152 KB, estimated 161319 objects 2014/05/27 14:52:12 kid1| Target number of buckets: 8065 2014/05/27 14:52:12 kid1| Using 8192 Store buckets 2014/05/27 14:52:12 kid1| Max Mem size: 2097152 KB 2014/05/27 14:52:12 kid1| Max Swap size: 0 KB 2014/05/27 14:52:12 kid1| Using Least Load store dir selection 2014/05/27 14:52:12 kid1| Set Current Directory to /tmp 2014/05/27 14:52:12 kid1| Finished loading MIME types and icons. 2014/05/27 14:52:12 kid1| HTCP Disabled. 2014/05/27 14:52:12 kid1| Squid plugin modules loaded: 0 2014/05/27 14:52:12 kid1| Accepting HTTP Socket connections at local=10.1.10.1:3129 remote=[::] FD 13 flags=9 2014/05/27 14:52:12 kid1| Accepting NAT intercepted HTTP Socket connections at local=10.1.10.1:3128 remote=[::] FD 14 flags=41 2014/05/27 14:52:13 kid1| storeLateRelease: released 0 objects squid.conf: root@voyage:/usr/local/squid/etc# vi squid.conf acl localnet src 10.0.0.0/8 # RFC1918 possible internal network acl Safe_ports port 80 # http acl Safe_ports port 21 # ftp acl Safe_ports port 443 # https acl Safe_ports port 70 # gopher acl Safe_ports port 210 # wais acl Safe_ports port 1025-65535 # unregistered ports acl Safe_ports port 280 # http-mgmt acl Safe_ports port 488 # gss-http acl Safe_ports port 591 # filemaker acl Safe_ports port 777 # multiling http acl SSL_ports port 443 acl CONNECT method CONNECT http_access deny !Safe_ports http_access deny CONNECT !SSL_ports http_access allow localhost manager http_access deny manager http_access allow localnet http_access allow localhost http_access deny all http_port 10.1.10.1:3129 http_port 10.1.10.1:3128 intercept cache_mem 2048 MB memory_cache_mode always access_log daemon:/tmp/var/log/squid/access.log squid cache_store_log daemon:/tmp/var/log/squid/store.log squid logfile_rotate 3 pid_filename /var/run/squid.pid cache_log /tmp/var/log/squid/cache.log coredump_dir /tmp refresh_pattern ^ftp: 1440 20% 10080 refresh_pattern ^gopher: 1440 0% 1440 refresh_pattern -i (/cgi-bin/|\?) 0 0% 0 refresh_pattern . 0 20% 4320 shutdown_lifetime 10 seconds This quid is running on a scaled down debian, no HDD, with mobile internet connection. So /tmp in fact is a RAM-disk, and a good hit rate very welcome. The example above should be cachable, or not ? squid was accessed on port 3128, intercept. -- View this message in context: http://squid-web-proxy-cache.1019090.n4.nabble.com/Why-not-cached-tp4666117.html Sent from the Squid - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
