On 13/05/2014 5:11 a.m., Tom Holder wrote: > I haven't investigated exactly, however, I'm guessing it's simply not > trying to mimic the original SSL and is just generating one that is > 'good-enough'. For my purposes, good enough is.... erm, good enough. > Exactly so. Amos > Tom > > On Mon, May 12, 2014 at 6:01 PM, Eliezer Croitoru <eliezer@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> How exactly client-first helps in that? >> >> Eliezer >> >> >> On 05/12/2014 10:26 AM, Walter H. wrote: >>> >>> Hi, >>> >>> change from server-first to client-first; and your issue is gone; >>> >>> Walter >> >> > > >
