Search squid archive

Re: Sibling A does not respond with sibling_hit even though there is a refreshed item in the sibling B (Squid 3.1)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 25/03/2013 05:55, sugusbs wrote:
1.     Sibling A receives 1st request for R and responds with tcp_miss and
FIRST_UP_PARENT.
2.     Sibling B receives 2nd request for R and responds with sibling_hit
due to sibling A.
3.     After R object gets expired, sibling A receives 3rd request for R and
responds with tcp_miss and FIRST_UP_PARENT.
4.     Sibling B receives 4th request for R and should respond with
sibling_hit but tcp_miss and FIRST_UP_PARENT.

The object R has been refreshed in step 3, why does sibling B responds with
FIRST_UP_PARENT in step 4?

I have the same question, using squid 3.1 It seems that whenever an objects exists in the cache but is stale, other siblings are not checked for a fresher object but only the origin server.

Is it possible to force a check of the object via a sibling first ?

if the object doesn't exist siblings are queried correctly, it's only when an object exists but is stale.

Michael






[Index of Archives]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Samba]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Linux USB]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux