I actually have no real issues. It works very well to be quite honest. :) Best regards, The Geek Guy Lawrence Pingree http://www.lawrencepingree.com/resume/ Author of "The Manager's Guide to Becoming Great" http://www.Management-Book.com -----Original Message----- From: Amos Jeffries [mailto:squid3@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] Sent: Tuesday, April 29, 2014 6:45 AM To: Dan Charlesworth; Lawrence Pingree Cc: squid-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Subject: Re: how to use refresh_pattern correct On 29/04/2014 4:16 p.m., Dan Charlesworth wrote: > Hi Lawrence > > I think that's the most extensive list of refresh patterns I've seen > in one place, for a forward proxy. Props. > > Is anyone else using a collection like this and care to comment on its > performance / viability? You can find many similar lists in the archives of this mailing list if you pick a really weird file extension type and search for it plus "refresh_pattern". eg. <https://www.google.co.nz/search?q=tgz+refresh_pattern+site%3Awww.squid-cach e.org> As for viability. It uses most of the HTTP violation refresh_pattern options based just on test for "file extension" patterns. I have no doubt that they cause many things to store and log as HITs but the reliability of the responses coming out of that cache is suspect. Amos
