On 13 April 2014 16:11, Nick Hill <nick@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > To paraphrase the logic coded here: > Don't cache anything with a query string UNLESS it matches the ACL > wupdatecachablequery. > > another way to write this more succinctly might be: > cache deny QUERY > cache allow wupdatecachablequery > > But I am not certain whether the deny clause will take a higher > priority than the allow clause in cases where both ACLs match. The > fandangled logic avoids this. > If the 'cache' directive follows the same rules as http_access, then Squid will stop processing any cache allow/deny directives as soon as any cache allow/deny directives have a positive match. So I can replace my logic with: cache allow wupdatecachablequery cache deny QUERY
