On 18/03/2014 9:29 p.m., Omid Kosari wrote: > AFAIK there is no complete guide for using FS types for squid . Historically > i am using ReiserFS 3.6 on Ubuntu 12.10 64bit . > > Here is my /etc/fstab > > /dev/sda1 /cache1 reiserfs > notail,noatime,nodiratime,data=writeback,barrier=none,async,commit=10 0 0 > /dev/sdb1 /cache2 reiserfs > notail,noatime,nodiratime,data=writeback,barrier=none,async,commit=10 0 0 > /dev/sdc1 /cache3 reiserfs > notail,noatime,nodiratime,data=writeback,barrier=none,async,commit=10 0 0 > > > and > > root@cache:~# cat /sys/block/sd*/queue/scheduler > noop [deadline] cfq > > > And some references > https://reiser4.wiki.kernel.org/index.php/Mount > http://doc.opensuse.org/products/draft/SLES/SLES-tuning_sd_draft/cha.tuning.io.html > > sda id SSD and sdb,sdc are SCSI 19k RPM and i think they should not be same > . > > Note :For people who are not aware , i suggest investigating on these > configs because they are very important for performance tuning of cache > server . > > Anybody has suggestions ? > > > 2 more questions . > 1 - Why squid does not going to implement its own FS ? even it may based on > other filesystems . You mean caches like COSS and Rock ? COSS could work on a raw device (at least the 2.7 version could). Rock does not (yet) simply because none has sponsored the work to make it so. > 2 - Why squid experts does not share their such configs and customizations > on wiki ? Good Question. Instructions on getting access to edit the wiki.squid-cache.org is on the front page in a big highlighted box. Those of us in the dev team with knowledge have already added it, a few others too (http://wiki.squid-cache.org/BestOsForSquid). Amos
