Search squid archive

Re: Re: What are recommended settings for optimal sharing of cache between SMP workers?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 19/02/2014 12:12 a.m., Dr.x wrote:
> im doubting ,
> without smp with same traffic and same users i can save 40Mbps
> 
> but in smp with combination of aufs with rock (32KB max obj size)
> i can only save 20Mbps
> 
> 
> im wondering does large rock will  heal me ?
> 

How many Squid processes are you currently needing to service those
users traffic?

If the number is >1 then the answer is probably yes.

 * Each worker should have same HIT ratio from AUFS cached objects. Then
the shared Rock storage should increase HIT ratio some for workers which
would not normally see those small objects.


> or return to aufs and wait untill squid relase version that has bigger
> object size ?
> 
> bw saving is a big issue to me and must be done !!!
> 

Your choice there.

FYI: The upcoming Squid series with large-rock support is not planned to
be packaged for another 3-6 months.

HTH
Amos





[Index of Archives]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Samba]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Linux USB]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux