On Sat, Feb 15, 2014 at 10:12 AM, Dr.x <ahmed.zaeem@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > @Rajiv Desai > > have u found increasing in bandwidth saving when u used large rock ?? Yes. Large rock works pretty well with multiple SMP workers (in my limited experience for past 5 days). I get 85% hit rate for previously read (and thereby cached) dataset. I will be looking into why there are 15% misses coz theoretically hit rate should be 100% for this test. > if so > how much difference u found ? Difference as compared to what? I believe rock store is the only SMP aware cache as stated in documentation. I did try with aufs initially but the hit rate was very poor as expected due to multiple workers. > > regards > > > > ----- > Dr.x > -- > View this message in context: http://squid-web-proxy-cache.1019090.n4.nabble.com/Performance-tuning-of-SMP-Large-rock-tp4664765p4664851.html > Sent from the Squid - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
