Hi Will, Why are you giving each worker a unique set of ports? Typically you configure one set of ports for all workers, and let the operating system handle the underlying machinery of sharing the ports across the worker processes. See here for more details: http://wiki.squid-cache.org/Features/SmpScale#Who_decides_which_worker_gets_the_request.3F Thanks, Nathan. -- Nathan Hoad Software Developer www.getoffmalawn.com On Thu, Jan 16, 2014 at 9:19 AM, Will Roberts <ironwill42@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Hi, > > I'm working with an SmpScale configuration with 2 workers defined. Each > worker has its own set of unique ports that it listens on. The coordinator > process doesn't have any http_port lines and generates tons of these > warnings: > > ERROR: No forward-proxy ports configured > > That doesn't seem great, am I missing something? I'm sure I can work around > this by giving it some dummy port to listen on, but I'd rather not if it > doesn't really need it. > > Thanks, > --Will
