Alex Rousskov wrote > http://wiki.squid-cache.org/Features/SmpScale#Will_similar_workers_receive_similar_amount_of_work.3F > > (but that is not the only theory in existence and YMMV). > > HTH, > > Alex. hi alex , thanks alot for reply , actually it was miss config , i was supposed to put visible hostname for other processes of squid ! again , relative to core/worker distribution , actually i visited http://wiki.squid-cache.org/Features/SmpScale#Will_similar_workers_receive_similar_amount_of_work.3F more and more , abut not understanding it 100 % i didnt find clear answer of " will similar workers have similar cpu ?? " , but as i understood , that developers made a patch tat optimize the cpu distribution , but also with result you put , there were clear difference of workers cores utiliztion does from you result , mean that we cant have full load core distribution ? regards ----- Dr.x -- View this message in context: http://squid-web-proxy-cache.1019090.n4.nabble.com/WARNING-Could-not-determine-this-machines-public-hostname-Please-configure-one-or-set-visible-hostna-tp4663074p4663099.html Sent from the Squid - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
