Search squid archive

Re: caching problem in squid 3.2 vs 3.1

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 30/10/2013 2:51 a.m., Ayham Abou Afach wrote:
Hi

i have the folloing problem after moving from squid 3.1 to ( 3.2 or 3.3
) with same config
bandwidth saving decreases to about 50%
what is the deffirance between versions related to caching behaviour ???

any one has a solution to this problem...

Regards


The big caching related changes:

* 3.2 version is now HTTP/1.1 - with extended cacheability and revalidation behaviour. - In some cases HTTP/1.0-based savings calculation can show a decrease even as total bandwidth is reduced. - More cacheable content (in HTTP/1.1 almost anything is cacheable) can mean more spare HIT rate. - avg store object age, size, near-HIT ratio also need to be considered more important for HTTP/1.1 - NP: Several of the refresh_pattern ignore-* and override-* options cause *reduction* in HTTP/1.1 compliant caches.

* 3.2 version is validating intercepted traffic safety.
 - Unsafe traffic will not be cached.

* 3.2 cache size calculations have been updated.
- Uncovering a bug where the maximum_object_size directive must be placed above the cache_dir for it to have any effect raising the object size limit on those cache_dir.

Amos




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Samba]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Linux USB]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux