Search squid archive

Re: Re: Windows 7 + Firefox + Squid + Kerberos

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



allan, did you configured firefoxwith the proxy fqdn squidsrv.example.com?
you're testing IE and firefox on the same client machine, right?

On Fri, Oct 25, 2013 at 1:49 PM, Markus Moeller <huaraz@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Hi Allan,
>
>   Before you see the Basic Auth does squid send a 407 with a list of auth
> method in the header ?  If not it looks like a bug in firefox.
>
> Markus
>
> "Allan Carvalho"  wrote in message
> news:BLU0-SMTP460D779A1F2EE168328E510D10D0@xxxxxxx...
>
>
> Hi Markus,
>
> Thanks for the reply, Wireshark shows me de negotiate exchange done
> correctly (GSS-API > Kerberos > Ticket > Realm > Server name), in both
> (IE and Firefox), suddenly, a package shows the basic authentication
> (Firefox), but i did not recognize why, the only difference I found was
> in the field Cookie.
> IE: Cookie: __utma=(...); __utmz=(...); EZCLIENT=(...)
> Firefox: Cookie: EZCLIENT=(...)
>
> Firefox doesn't have the __utma and __utmz, would that be the problem?
>
> Regards
> Allan Carvalho
>
> Em 24/10/2013 19:02, Markus Moeller escreveu:
>>
>> Hi Allan,
>>
>>     Can you take a capture of the traffic from your client to squid with
>> wireshark ?  Look at port 3128 (squid proxy port) traffic and in the
>> details you can see the negotiate exchange.  Can you compare what you
>> see with IE and firefox ?  Wireshark allows you to expand into the
>> Negotiate details where you should see some unencrypted details (e.g.
>> HTTP/squidsrv.example.com)
>>
>>    They should look the same for IE and Firefox.
>>
>> Regards
>> Markus
>
>
>




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Samba]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Linux USB]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux