I love squid and working with it for several years . For many years i was betting on squid at least in forwarding proxy cache . But recently a new competitor comes to open source market http://trafficserver.apache.org/ I did not even tested it but i am going to prepare myself to defend squid against ATS fan :) His main sentence is Squid is like Apache http server (has many features but lazy) and ATS is like nginx (less features but lightweight) . I reviewed ATS . in theorical world it has most of critical features that i need that even some commercial caches doesn't have like TPROXY . even it supports long time squid feature request cacheurl . http://trafficserver.apache.org/docs/trunk/admin/plugins/cacheurl/index.en.html Also they created a section in wiki to translate squid configuration to ATS config . https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/TS/SquidConfigTranslation A simple search in google shows some articles about comparing "apache traffic server vs squid" like : http://static.usenix.org/events/lisa11/tech/slides/hedstrom.pdf http://archive.apachecon.com/na2013/presentations/27-Wednesday/A_Patchy_Web/16:15-Apache_Traffic_Server.pdf Now i am trying to inform Squid community to create some comparisons and articles in web to reinforcement squid . I really love to see good informative comments . Thanks -- View this message in context: http://squid-web-proxy-cache.1019090.n4.nabble.com/Apache-Traffic-Server-vs-Squid-tp4662589.html Sent from the Squid - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
