On 07/24/2013 10:11 PM, Amos Jeffries wrote: > On 25/07/2013 7:08 a.m., Eliezer Croitoru wrote: >> On 07/24/2013 10:02 PM, Amos Jeffries wrote: >>> On 25/07/2013 1:44 a.m., Golden Shadow wrote: >>>> Hi, >>>> >>>> You can show them the hits statistics you get from the cache manager >>>> using: >>>> squidclient mgr:info >>>> >>>> However, having a hit ratio of 30% let's say does not necessarily mean >>>> that squid would save you 30% of bandwidth. >>> On the contrary. That is exactly what "Byte HIT-ratio" means: that in >>> the last 5 min or 60 min (whichever it appears in) it has *already* >>> saved that much % of upstream bandwidth. >>> >>> Amos >>> >> Would squid change the expiration headers? >> it means that IMS requests will accrue more frequently and it means that >> the bandwidth saving is much more then most logs will show. > > Squid should not be, unless the refresh responded with new ones. In > which case those new ones get passed on and if possible the existign > cache updated (see bug #7 though). > > Amos Have seen and responded. Eliezer