On Thu, Jun 20, 2013 at 5:21 PM, Marcus Kool <marcus.kool@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > On 06/20/2013 06:51 AM, Amos Jeffries wrote: >> >> >> >>> If anyone is interested with very detailed benchmarks, then I can provide >>> them. >> >> >> Yes please :-) >> >> PS. could you CC the squid-dev mailing list as well with the details. The >> more developer eyes we can get on this data the better. Although please do >> test a current release first, we have significantly >> changed the ACL handling which was one bottleneck in Squid, and have >> altered the mempools use of memset() is several locations in the latest >> 3.HEAD code. >> >> Amos > > > I understand that Amos is eager to get more tests and more results about > the latest enhancements, but as Amos himself also stated earlier, please > use a released version of Squid for testing since the test results for > 3.3.x or 3.4.x are interesting for admins of Squid who can consider > upgrading, > but test results for 3.HEAD are not useful for them since they are not > likely > to consider an upgrade to 3.HEAD. Yes sure I can do that. > > And if you have spare resources, it would be interesting to perform the > same test for 3.3.5 and 3.2.11 to see the differences between releases. > And of course, when 3.4 comes out, perform the test again... > > The test that you performed is very nice. I am sure that many like this. > But I also like to see the full squid.conf. Just for transparency and > maybe to suggest an optimisation tweak. > > Thanks > Marcus -- Regards, -Ahmed Talha Khan
