On Tue, Jun 11, 2013 at 11:21 AM, Eliezer Croitoru <eliezer@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On 6/11/2013 10:56 AM, Alex Domoradov wrote: >> >> Amos, any idea? >> > Just asking. > do you understand the difference between a TCP_HIT and > TCP_REFRESH_UNMODIFIED ?? > Looking at the wiki again it seems like it would be helpful just to see this > specific section: > http://wiki.squid-cache.org/SquidFaq/SquidLogs?action=fullsearch&context=180&value=TCP_REFRESH_UNMODIFIED&titlesearch=Titles#Squid_result_codes > > You might not understand that: > TCP_REFRESH_UNMODIFIED is actually a HIT based on the origin server(or a > parent proxy). > if you have lots of TCP_REFRESH_UNMODIFIED in your log file you can tell > your clients (in a case of only one proxy between the client and the site) > that they get it from cache while making sure it's the file they should get > and also the server knows that yet another client gets a good and valid > reply. > > try to make a calculation of all these requests like this: > sum of bytes that was sent to clients less the bytes that was sent on the > 304 request from squid = you got your HIT in bandwidth length rather then > FULL not From Wire transfer. But in such case (with reload-into-ims and refresh_pattern) should such requests exists at all? All I want is to ignore ALL caching options and timestamp and always get objects directly only from cache > Am I being clear enough or I should give you more details? > Eliezer enough and to spare :) >> On Tue, May 28, 2013 at 1:00 PM, Alex Domoradov <alex.hha@xxxxxxxxx> >> wrote: > > <SNIP>
