On Sat, 18 May 2013 01:27:36 +0800 csn233 <csn233@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Sat, May 18, 2013 at 1:09 AM, csn233 <csn233@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >>> I didn't bother spending any more time on it. > >> > >> ufdbGuard is a more powerful substitute of squidGuard. > >> Has regular updates and even free support. > >> > >> Marcus > > Sure. You forgot to mention though, squidGuard is free whereas > ufdbGuard is a licensed product. > > Small point I know, but relevant. > ^ You guys crack me up. - Signed, Fix Nichols http://www.squidblacklist.org
