Let's try this again....
While you are busy with the deb packages, how about not putting in a
squid.conf and rather calling it squid.conf.default, or do "include"
configs like Apache ? Pretty please ? :)
I'm not sure I understand the first suggestion there about squid.cofn
and squid.conf.default?
I've tried to convince people to follow the Apache config include
style. But it gets really nasty to manage related directive ordering.
Or did you mean something else entirely?
Amos
Hi Amos,
Instead of the package containing "squid.conf", make it contain
"squid.conf.default" or "squid.conf.example"
Nope - you are spot on, I meant the Apache config include style :) What
if you use 00_ 01_ 02_ etc ?
Cheers,
Pieter
