I think it's a squid -> server message, and the cache is nginx. Hey Amos, squid will always respond with a MISS to requests with "Cache-Control: max-age=0" ? There's a way to ignore it with configurations? I'm thinking about windows updates, MS probably sets that to zero. In what other situation a client does this? On Tue, Apr 23, 2013 at 1:26 AM, Amos Jeffries <squid3@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On 23/04/2013 1:52 a.m., syaifuddin wrote: >> >> header and respond > > > NOTE: when dealing with a proxy there are *two* pairs of request/response to > check. One set client-squid and the other squid-server. Both have an effect > on the transaction cacheability. > > As does the traffic mode. > > >> >> http://www.megalink-online.com/images/logo-d-link.jpg >> >> GET /images/logo-d-link.jpg HTTP/1.1 > > > This is a port-80 format request. Are you intercepting? > > >> Host: www.megalink-online.com >> Connection: keep-alive >> Cache-Control: max-age=0 > > > This is an instruction from the requestor *not* to use any cached objects > when responding. The response is always supposed to be a MISS. > > >> Accept: text/html,application/xhtml+xml,application/xml;q=0.9,*/*;q=0.8 >> User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1) AppleWebKit/537.31 (KHTML, like >> Gecko) Chrome/26.0.1410.64 Safari/537.31 >> Referer: >> >> http://squid-web-proxy-cache.1019090.n4.nabble.com/Squid-3-4-Head-can-t-cache-static-url-td4659576.html >> Accept-Encoding: gzip,deflate,sdch >> Accept-Language: en,id;q=0.8,en-US;q=0.6 >> Accept-Charset: ISO-8859-1,utf-8;q=0.7,*;q=0.3 >> If-Modified-Since: Tue, 18 Oct 2011 04:23:16 GMT >> >> HTTP/1.1 304 Not Modified >> Server: nginx admin >> Date: Mon, 22 Apr 2013 13:49:56 GMT >> Last-Modified: Tue, 18 Oct 2011 04:23:16 GMT >> Connection: keep-alive >> Expires: Mon, 29 Apr 2013 13:49:56 GMT >> Cache-Control: max-age=604800 >> X-Cache: HIT from Backend > > > This response says there was a cached object considered (HIT), and the > answer to the clients If-Modified-Since question is UNMODIFIED. It looks > perfectly correct and normal to me. > > > Your report was that Squid was not caching URLs, but this *is* caching > (somewhere). So.... > Where is the server named "Backend"? > what caching software is it running? > and how did the request get there? (what path through what software, > delivered by what means?) > > Amos
