Search squid archive

Re: squid release cycle

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 3/04/2013 1:02 a.m., E.S. Rosenberg wrote:
Hi all,
After digging through the squid-cache website and wiki but not finding
I'm turning to you.

I have been asked to create a new squid machine at work based on
freeBSD, currently FreeBSD ports doesn't have Squid-3.3 yet.

In general how long will Stable squid releases be supported, Squid-3.1
seems to have been supported for about 2 years, on the other hand
release speed seems to be much higher then before....

Thanks,
Eli

Yes we don't seem to have the main project policy formally in writing anywhere. The support lifetime is up to the maintainer. Meaning myself and a host of distro package maintainers. I think its safe to say we all try to support as few options as possible to keep the workload low. But there is a lot of variance due to many circumstances.

What I try to do for consistency (even if I'm a bit flexible) is:

* Each minor version release is deprecated when the next release in its series is packaged. * Each major series is deprecated when the next major series are packaged as stable. * I also try to provide general user support for the current release series back only as far as the last security vulnerability.

As you note teh fast 3.3 cycle and now the fast 3.4 cycle have called into question how strictly it should be followed. I have spent the last few months considering exactly that question, opinions are welcome.

I am expecting release speed to settle down to around 6-12 months, but we shall see.

Amos




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Samba]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Linux USB]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux