Re: Basic question on refresh_pattern

[Amos Jeffries <squid3@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

On 26/03/2013 12:15 a.m., Eliezer Croitoru wrote:
> On 03/25/2013 12:16 PM, Amos Jeffries wrote:
> > Since all URLs are one or more bytes long it always matches, ie "any 
> > URL".
> >
> > But don't confuse that for meaning the pattern applies on *all* URLs. 
> > It only matches when refresh_pattern is applied and only if no 
> > earlier pattern matched the URL.
> >
> > Amos 
> it's the most basic rule that should exist right?
>
> Eliezer

Yes. The behaviour when there are no refresh_pattern is unknown to me, 
but probably not good.

Amos