On 19/03/2013 9:27 p.m., Sokvantha YOUK wrote:
Dear All,
I am appreciate your expert advices on this matter :). I have tried
with following configuration but it is strange that WCCP2 is not
initiated the communication with Cisco Router. I were using this
configuration before, wccp2 was working fine.
What do you mean by "before" ?
... same Squid, same config working yesterday?
... SMP support enabled in older Squid before we coded it?
... or earlier releases without SMP support were working with WCCP?
Operation System: CentOS 6.4, x64 bits, Kernel 2.6.32-358.2.1.el6.x86_64
Below is my configuration:
1. Disk mount option
/dev/sdb1 /cache1 ext4
defaults,noatime,nodiratime,noacl,barrier=0,data=writeback,commit=100
0 0
/dev/sdc1 /cache2 ext4
defaults,noatime,nodiratime,noacl,barrier=0,data=writeback,commit=100
0 0
/dev/sdd1 /cache3 ext4
defaults,noatime,nodiratime,noacl,barrier=0,data=writeback,commit=100
0 0
/dev/sde1 /cache4 ext4
defaults,noatime,nodiratime,noacl,barrier=0,data=writeback,commit=100
0 0
/dev/sdf1 /cache5 ext4
defaults,noatime,nodiratime,noacl,barrier=0,data=writeback,commit=100
0 0
/dev/sdg1 /cache6 ext4
defaults,noatime,nodiratime,noacl,barrier=0,data=writeback,commit=100
0 0
/dev/sdh1 /cache7 ext4
defaults,noatime,nodiratime,noacl,barrier=0,data=writeback,commit=100
0 0
/dev/sdi1 /cache8 ext4
defaults,noatime,nodiratime,noacl,barrier=0,data=writeback,commit=100
0 0
2. Squid compiled option
Squid Cache: Version 3.3.3-20130318-r12517
configure options: '--sysconfdir=/etc/squid'
'--enable-follow-x-forwarded-for' '--enable-snmp'
'--enable-linux-netfilter' '--enable-http-violations'
'--enable-delay-pools' '--enable-storeio=diskd,aufs,ufs,rock'
'--with-large-files' '--enable-removal-policies=lru,heap'
'--enable-ltdl-convenience' '--with-logdir=/var/log/squid'
'--enable-wccpv2' '--with-default-user=squid'
'--enable-log-daemon-helpers' '--enable-build-info'
'--enable-url-rewrite-helpers' '--enable-async-io=128'
3. Squid Configuration
#######################################################
# wccpv2 configuration
#######################################################
wccp2_router <wccp router ip>
wccp2_forwarding_method 2
wccp2_return_method 2
wccp_version 4
wccp2_assignment_method 2
FYI: Since 3.2 the above magic numbers can all be written as textual
labels for easier reading.
wccp2_service dynamic 80 password=abc
wccp2_service_info 80 protocol=tcp flags=src_ip_hash priority=240 ports=80
wccp2_service dynamic 90 password=abc
wccp2_service_info 90 protocol=tcp flags=dst_ip_hash,ports_source
priority=240 ports=80
# Rockstore filesytem
workers 4
cpu_affinity_map process_numbers=1,2,3,4 cores=1,3,5,7
cache_dir rock /cache1 170000 max-size=31000
cache_dir rock /cache2 170000 max-size=31000
cache_dir rock /cache3 170000 max-size=31000
cache_dir rock /cache4 170000 max-size=31000
cache_dir rock /cache5 170000 max-size=31000
cache_dir rock /cache6 170000 max-size=31000
# AUFS file system
if ${process_number}=4
cache_dir aufs /cache7/squid/${process_number} 170000 16 256
min-size=31001 max-size=200000000
cache_dir aufs /cache8/squid/${process_number} 170000 16 256
min-size=31001 max-size=200000000
endif
I don't understand which directive impacted on WCCP2 protocol which
prevented it from establishing communication with the router.
So as result http traffic is not redirected to this squid server :(
If there is any way you can tcpdump the WCCP packets please do. The
latest versions of Wireshark are able to decipher the WCCP packets
peoperly now.
May you help suggest me what else to check for the bug?
I am suspecting it is SMP suport issue. WCCP code is not SMP aware. It
should theoretically be SMP agnostic in that all workers are pinging the
router and advertising the same details, so in theory the router just
gets 4x the normal HERE_I_AM packet pings.
Amos
