babajaga wrote > 25% ... is that byte-hitrate ? > If YES: not very impressive. > > I have self-made cache, especially for youtube. And between 30%-35% > byte-hitrate, daily, with about 20GB/day traffic, incl. cached data. > However, 4TB disk space in use. > >>2- the performance of video cache is bad , it just make about 5 M at max . < > > What does this mean ? hi babajaga , thanks for reply , but im sorry to ask you wt do u mean with "byte-hitrate " ??? agian , my question is about kernel , does new kernel may make problems with 3rd parties like videocache ??? im using kernel 3.7.5 the original kernel of centos 6.3 is 3.2.x as i remember , i mean i had to rebuild it with "tproxy" supporting . i said that with the config of squid , i can save about 25 % of bw and squidguard is excellent . ======================================================================= about the bad performance of videocache , i mean because most of connections is "timewait " not "established" the performance of youtube is bad , and it seems as im not using videocache , i monitored the cache of videocache it just make 5 M - 10 M as maximum !!!!! i mean that im only caching 25 % whatever in the absence of videocache or in the presence of videocache . regards -- View this message in context: http://squid-web-proxy-cache.1019090.n4.nabble.com/which-kernel-is-best-for-squid-3-xx-with-centos-6-3-with-youtube-caching-tp4658999p4659007.html Sent from the Squid - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
