Search squid archive

Re: cache_dir on /dev/shm?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 02/06/2013 02:48 PM, Scott Baker wrote:
> I want to store all my cache dir on a ram disk. I have this in my config:
> 
> cache_dir ufs /dev/shm/squid 1024 16 256
> 
> Is there any reason NOT to do this? 

Yes, memory cache is generally faster than any cache_dir cache.


> All the stuff in my cache is time
> sensitive (expires after 15 minutes) so I'm not worried about losing
> data, just worried about best practices.

If you do not need the cache to survive Squid crashes, use memory cache.


> cache_mem 1024 MB
> 
> in my config. With ONLY this entry, everything results in a TCP_MISS.
> I'm guessing the cache_mem isn't used the same way as a cache_dir?

You need to figure out why Squid does not want to use your memory cache.
This will help even if you later decide to use a cache_dir in addition
to the memory cache (for some valid reason).

I do not know of a simple way to answer that question (I always look at
cache.log with high debug levels), but I hope others on this list do. If
that way does not exist, we should add code to Squid to support such
answers.


Good luck,

Alex.



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Samba]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Linux USB]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux