Search squid archive

Re: R: [squid-users] WARNING: no_suid: setuid(0): (1) Operation not permitted

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 4/02/2013 11:35 p.m., Simone Levy wrote:
On 02/01/2013 01:09 AM, Amos Jeffries wrote:
On 1/02/2013 6:03 a.m., Alex Rousskov wrote:
On 01/31/2013 03:06 AM, Amos Jeffries wrote:
On 31/01/2013 10:24 p.m., Simone Levy wrote:
Hello there,

we are receiving warnings after upgrading squid from version 3.1 to
3.2 on FreeBSD. Squid appears to be fully operational though.

The warnings seem to be relative to starting the helpers and opening
the log files, but the helpers are started and the log files written to.
When dealing with logs from asynchronous event code things are not
always as they seem.
If those are working its most likely not them.

You might have to start Squid under a debugger to find out what
specifically setuid is being called for.
Amos,

      FWIW, I have seen this warning on FreeBSD as well. Squid calls
set_uid(0) unconditionally. My setuid man page does not mention UID of
zero, and I have not investigated why that call was added, but I have a
feeling that FreeBSD does not like it:

no_suid(void)
{
...
      debugs(21, 3, "no_suid: PID " << getpid() << " giving up root priveleges for ever");

      if (setuid(0) < 0)
          debugs(50, DBG_IMPORTANT, "WARNING: no_suid: setuid(0): " << xstrerror());

Hmm. Yes the warning is new since we started adding debugs() about failed system calls to display reviously hidden system errors.

Looking at all the documentation about setuid() and seteuid() I'm wondering if this was supposed to be seteuid(0) - to clear any effective-user restrictions before dropping
privileges down to the low-privileges UID.

I'm also wondering if setuid(uid) was done earlier and the low-privilege user is what is being dened the setuid(0) - but I can't see any sign of the "Dropping privileges"
message that should appear first. Can one of you start your Squid with level-3 debug and see where in this startup list the dropping message appears?

There is also http://bugs.squid-cache.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3751 involved with this somehow.


Amos
Hi Amos,

here's a cache.log excerpt after setting debug_options ALL,3.

2013/02/04 09:44:35.142| tools.cc(757) enter_suid: enter_suid: PID 2156 taking root privileges
2013/02/04 09:44:35.142| cache_manager.cc(103) registerProfile: registering legacy config
2013/02/04 09:44:35.142| cache_manager.cc(88) registerProfile: registered profile: config
2013/02/04 09:44:35.142| mem.cc(485) Report: Memory pools are 'on'; limit: 5.000 MB
2013/02/04 09:44:35.142| main.cc(1414) SquidMain: Doing post-config initialization

2013/02/04 09:44:35.142| tools.cc(690) leave_suid: leave_suid: PID 2156 called
2013/02/04 09:44:35.142| tools.cc(712) leave_suid: leave_suid: PID 2156 giving up root, becoming 'squid'
2013/02/04 09:44:35.142| tools.cc(757) enter_suid: enter_suid: PID 2156 taking root privileges
2013/02/04 09:44:35.143| fd.cc(221) fd_open: fd_open() FD 0 stdin
2013/02/04 09:44:35.143| fd.cc(221) fd_open: fd_open() FD 1 stdout
2013/02/04 09:44:35.143| fd.cc(221) fd_open: fd_open() FD 2 stderr
2013/02/04 09:44:35.143| tools.cc(690) leave_suid: leave_suid: PID 2156 called
2013/02/04 09:44:35.143| tools.cc(712) leave_suid: leave_suid: PID 2156 giving up root, becoming 'squid'
2013/02/04 09:44:35.143| fd.cc(221) fd_open: fd_open() FD 3 /var/log/squid/cache.log
2013/02/04 09:44:35.143| Starting Squid Cache version 3.2.6 for amd64-portbld-freebsd9.0...
2013/02/04 09:44:35.143| Process ID 2156
2013/02/04 09:44:35.143| Process Roles: master worker
[...]
2013/02/04 09:44:35.144| helperOpenServers: Starting 5/20 'ntlm_auth' processes
2013/02/04 09:44:35.144| fd.cc(221) fd_open: fd_open() FD 7 IPC UNIX STREAM Parent
2013/02/04 09:44:35.144| fd.cc(221) fd_open: fd_open() FD 8 IPC UNIX STREAM Parent
2013/02/04 09:44:35.144| ipc.cc(196) ipcCreate: ipcCreate: prfd FD 7
2013/02/04 09:44:35.144| ipc.cc(197) ipcCreate: ipcCreate: pwfd FD 7
2013/02/04 09:44:35.144| ipc.cc(198) ipcCreate: ipcCreate: crfd FD 8
2013/02/04 09:44:35.144| ipc.cc(199) ipcCreate: ipcCreate: cwfd FD 8
2013/02/04 09:44:35.144| comm.cc(1077) _comm_close: comm_close: start closing FD 8
2013/02/04 09:44:35.144| comm.cc(735) commUnsetFdTimeout: Remove timeout for FD 8
2013/02/04 09:44:35.145| tools.cc(690) leave_suid: leave_suid: PID 2157 called
2013/02/04 09:44:35.145| tools.cc(783) no_suid: no_suid: PID 2157 giving up root priveleges forever
2013/02/04 09:44:35.145| WARNING: no_suid: setuid(0): (1) Operation not permitted
2013/02/04 09:44:35.145| comm.cc(735) commUnsetFdTimeout: Remove timeout for FD 7

Like I thought it is running no_suid() while at the low-privileged account level.

You are also right, it is the forked helper process which is doing the no_suid().


Amos



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Samba]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Linux USB]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux