On Thu, 24 Jan 2013 07:51:08 +0100 Loïc BLOT wrote: > Yes, but i'm not satisfied of performances. FFS is too slow for high > used squid and the performance gain is visible. > It's right i use redundant cache under memory, but it's only a 4Gbit > cache (then 8Gbit). AFAIK they're exclusive caches. > Maybe it will be useful to remove disk_cache, but is this possible ? It is, and unless you stop and start the daemon a lot, that's probably better than what you're doing at the moment. Also once you've transferred the mfs memory to squid, you *may* be able to add a real disk cache because of the reduced load on the disk. I'd try starting with a small diskd cache just to see if ffs can cope with the base load of objects evicted from the memory cache.
