I dont have code and I havnt looked at it at all.
I just changed my ulimit to lower then my 65535 to 8192 and restarted squid.
Then it showed that the limit is 8192 in the cache.log.
My squid is compiled with 65535 FD...
But later I will have a small look at the code just to make sure how it
was done.
Eliezer
On 30/12/2012 10:11, Jackie Zhang wrote:
Dear Eliezer,
Can you show me the code snippet? Perhaps it's not in the current
stable version? because users usually do not pull from trunk but
download the "stable" version from the website.
t
On Sat, Dec 29, 2012 at 11:53 PM, Eliezer Croitoru <eliezer@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
There is..
and squid does that..
the limit in compilation options just set the settings to this specific
default which if not available ignored and uses the limit by the system and
it's logged in the cache.log file.
Maybe this function dosnt work well but I'm almost sure it works fine since
it works fine for me.
Eliezer
On 30/12/2012 09:21, Tianyin Xu wrote:
yes, it's confusing to have two different fd limits, one for squid and
one for OS.
I wonder is it possible to obtain the system fd limits, and put it in
the log message when squid is running out of fds? I think that would
solve all these kind of problems.
T
On Sat, Dec 29, 2012 at 3:27 PM, Eliezer Croitoru <eliezer@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
Great!
Nice to know that.
On 30/12/2012 00:02, 叶雨飞 wrote:
ubuntu 10.04 . and appearently /etc/security/limits.conf is not
working on it because it doesn;t configure with pam_session.
I just added ulimit -n 65535 in my launch script
--
Eliezer Croitoru
https://www1.ngtech.co.il
sip:ngtech@xxxxxxxxxxxx
IT consulting for Nonprofit organizations
eliezer <at> ngtech.co.il
--
Eliezer Croitoru
https://www1.ngtech.co.il
sip:ngtech@xxxxxxxxxxxx
IT consulting for Nonprofit organizations
eliezer <at> ngtech.co.il
--
Eliezer Croitoru
https://www1.ngtech.co.il
sip:ngtech@xxxxxxxxxxxx
IT consulting for Nonprofit organizations
eliezer <at> ngtech.co.il
