Dear amos, Is there any update ________________________________________ From: Muhammed Shehata [m.shehata@xxxxxxxxxx] Sent: Monday, December 17, 2012 10:24 AM To: Amos Jeffries Cc: squid-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; IT Network Security Subject: Re: Squid3 extremely slow for some website cnn.com 2nd file for large attach size Best Regards, *Muhammad Shehata* IT Network Security Engineer TEData Building A11- B90, Smart Village Km 28 Cairo - Alex Desert Road, 6th October, 12577, Egypt T: +20 (2) 33 32 0700 | Ext: 1532 F: +20 (2) 33 32 0800 | M: E: m.shehata@xxxxxxxxxx On 12/13/2012 11:58 PM, Amos Jeffries wrote: > > On 13/12/2012 9:41 p.m., Muhammed Shehata wrote: >> Dear Amos, >> -the interrelation: >> the logs are from two squid similar servers that only differ in >> version and client at both request doesn't disconnect or anything the >> aborted maybe mean that squid can't get this url contains java script >> but what I wonder of why squid can get it successfully >> -here is the logs with time : >> squid2 on Centos5.2 > 1355387935.418 7 x.x.x.x TCP_MISS/304 324 >> GET http://cdn.optimizely.com/js/128727546.js - DIRECT/23.50.196.211 >> text/javascript >> squid3 on Centos 6.3 > >> 13/Dec/2012:10:39:05 +0200 20020 x.x.x.x TCP_MISS_ABORTED/000 0 GET >> http://cdn.optimizely.com/js/128727546.js - >> HIER_DIRECT/cdn.optimizely.com - >> 13/Dec/2012:10:39:25 +0200 20020 x.x.x.x TCP_MISS_ABORTED/000 0 GET >> http://cdn.optimizely.com/js/128727546.js - >> HIER_DIRECT/cdn.optimizely.com - >> > > Aha. Thanks this makes more sense. 7ms with a response versus 20 > seconds with nothing returned. > > Although for better debug you should get the squid-3 to leave upstream > server IP address in the log. It could be some problem of which IP is > being connected to by Squid. > > With 3.2 at "debugs_options 11,2" you get a cache.log HTTP trace of > what is going between Squid and optimizely and client. I suspect > optimizely is not responding when a request is delivered to them - but > you need to track that down. > > Amos
