Search squid archive

RE: Impressions of 3.2.1

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Have downgraded back to 3.1.20 on one server without any changes to the hardware.
Everything working fine till now.

Rgds,
Sunil

-----Original Message-----
From: Amos Jeffries [mailto:squid3@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] 
Sent: Monday, September 10, 2012 11:22 PM
To: squid-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re:  Impressions of 3.2.1

On 11.09.2012 01:16, Eliezer Croitoru wrote:
> On 9/7/2012 11:29 AM, Daniel Beschorner wrote:
>> Thank you for the advice!
>> We don't use a disk cache, but anyway good to know.
>>
>> Daniel
>>
>> <031701cd8cc3$c626b7f0$527427d0$@hyperia.com>:
>>> Greetings,
>>>
>>> For migrating to 3.1 to 3.2 did you have to reinitialize the squid 
>>> dir.
>>>
>>> Had tried to move from 3.1 to 3.2 a couple of times but was 
>>> unsuccessful.
>>> There were frequent "FATAL: Received Segment Violation...dying." 
>>> messages .
>>>
>>> Rgds,
>>> Sunil
>>
> weird because I have use 3.1.20 and 3.2.0.19-3.2.1 with the same 
> cache_dir no getting any of these problems.
> what version of 3.1?


For 3.1.20 you will have already had to do the swap.state file rebuild. 
It is required for migrating to any 3.1.19 or later Squid to create a swap.state file with checksums added. see bug 3441 for more details.

Reinitialize is not specifically required, but is the easy way to upgrade the cache without any downtime.

Amos




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Samba]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Linux USB]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux