Search squid archive

Re: Fw:Re: [squid-users] squid 3.2.0.18 transparent nat interception

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 31/08/2012 7:07 a.m., Eliezer Croitoru wrote:
On 8/30/2012 1:23 PM, Pawel Mojski wrote:
> And that's why I have a problem. I have to force squid to use old (like
> in 3.1) transparent connection mechanism.
> For the moment I bypassed the problem using proxy chaining. I installed
> squid 3.1 also. Squid 3.2 listening on port 8080 and squid 3.1 listening
> on 8081 port in "transparent" mode with squid 3.2 on 127.0.0.1:8080 as
> cache_peer.
it's pretty weird.
i have squid 3.2.1 with the same setup but no the problem.
the proxy is the gw and i use redirect.. all requests works..

what does your squid.conf contains?
what do you have exactly in your iptables?(all rules).

Pawl started his problem description with "on the gateway". Which is a phrase usually only used by people with separate gateway and Squid devices. Meaning he very probably is doing NAT on packets outdside of the Squid box - the #1 side effect of doing things that way is the SYN packet problem he described.

NAT creates a lie in the packet headers. The gateway box is lying to Squid box about where the packets are destined. Squid now operates transparently (when possible) "believes" that lie and sends the request there, just like any bridge or switch would if the proxy were turned off.

Amos



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Samba]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Linux USB]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux