Search squid archive

Re: I want to verify why squid wont cache a specific object.

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 8/20/2012 2:37 AM, Eliezer Croitoru wrote:
On 8/20/2012 1:38 AM, Amos Jeffries wrote:

The FFFFFFFF is the file number/name where it is being stored. Since
this is an erased operation that is always the magic F value.

It is not 1-to-1 related to the object being cacheable. It just means
the object *currently* stored needs removing. Non-cacheable objects the
RELEASE immediately follows storage, for cacheable objects being
replaced the erase of old content immediately follows storage of new
copies.
OK
<SNIP>
just a bit more interesting data.
there is a different between intercepted requests(NAT and TPROXTY) to using regular proxy http requests.

on regular proxy everything works fine and the file is being cached always.
(I use two squids.. both with url rewriter that causes the like "store_url_rewite" effect on the cache.) it works always for youtube on the same setup so I dont really know what the cause can be.

it narrows down the bug into a very small area which is:
3.2.1 TPROXY\INTERCEPT + cache_peer + specific requests

		vs

3.2.1 regular proxy + cache_peer + specific requests

there is a different in the requests that was made on regular proxy or intercepted requests that the url has a "@" sign in it but it's not suppose to change a thing.

I will file a bug later but I want first to verify more about it.

also tested with squid 3.1.20 with the same exact setup using intercet\tproxy\forward proxy and in 3.1 it all works just fine.

so it's a bug in squid 3.2.1


Thanks,
Eliezer
--
Eliezer Croitoru
https://www1.ngtech.co.il
IT consulting for Nonprofit organizations
eliezer <at> ngtech.co.il


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Samba]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Linux USB]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux