Search squid archive

Re: auth_param ntlm children vs Site Size

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 9/07/2012 9:13 p.m., Jason Leschnik wrote:
Hey all,

Just curious about what size your user base is compared to how many
children processes you have for ntlm authentication. We found with
1000-1500 users that 30 children was no enough, resulting in cache.log
queue warnings. So what combination have you found reasonable?

For NTLM the theoretical ideal is about 4 helpers per active user (ouch!), just because of the extremely inefficient way it works. As you cut down the ratio of helpers:users from that the user-visible lag becomes longer. So yes a few dozen heleprs for a thousand users is nowhere near enough. It's not uncommon to see a few hundred NTLM helpers in one Squid instance for your user levels. Try making that 100 helper children and see what the loading is. The low numbered helepers will get a lot of requests tailing off to least load on the 100th helper.

If you have a choice go for Kerberos instead or as first preference over NTLM.

Amos



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Samba]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Linux USB]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux