Search squid archive

Re: Problem with Single Sign-On & NTLM

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 14.06.2012 00:49, Garry wrote:
Hi,

following some howtos/tutorials on the net I managed to get SSO with
NTLM to work ... anyway, there are some significant delay during
authentication ...
I see the two failed 407 requests, then there's some 5-10 second delay
before the successful requests follow.

I've did some strace on the processes and found that the ntlm helper
seems to be causing the delay, specifically the one with the
squid-2.5-ntlmssp
helper protocol. Here's an excerpt from the strace run:

7289  14:14:15 _llseek(2, 0, [809868], SEEK_CUR) = 0
7289 14:14:15 write(2, "NTLMSSP Sign/Seal - Initialising"..., 45) = 45
7289  14:14:15 munmap(0xb775d000, 4096) = 0
7289 14:14:15 fstat64(2, {st_mode=S_IFREG|0640, st_size=809913, ...}) = 0
7289  14:14:15 mmap2(NULL, 4096, PROT_READ|PROT_WRITE,
MAP_PRIVATE|MAP_ANONYMOUS, -1, 0) = 0xb775d000
7289  14:14:15 _llseek(2, 0, [809913], SEEK_CUR) = 0
7289 14:14:15 write(2, "Got NTLMSSP neg_flags=0xa2088205"..., 33) = 33
7289  14:14:15 munmap(0xb775d000, 4096) = 0
7289  14:14:15 write(1, "AF administrator\n", 17) = 17
7289 14:14:15 read(0, "YR TlRMTVNTUAABAAAAB4IIogAAAAAAA"..., 4096) = 60
7289  14:14:24 uname({sys="Linux", node="BSSVR03", ...}) = 0
7289  14:14:24 socket(PF_NETLINK, SOCK_RAW, 0) = 5

The system call that delays the processing above is actually the
"read(0," call at 14:14:15, which _starts_ at :15, but doesn't finish
until :24 ... I've combined tracing both the Squid process and the auth
helper, but can't discern any routing that in itself would cause the
delay (see below).

It is not routing as such. The helper has to contact the network DC and generate new crypto keys, this can take time. Especially if the DC is under load. This should help explain what work each of those I/O lines is triggering:
http://wiki.squid-cache.org/Features/AddonHelpers#Negotiate_and_NTLM_Scheme



I also noticed a post on the Net that talked about M$ deprecating NTLM (now they do?) in favor of Kerberos, and that Squid 3.2 would have the direct Kerberos auth available. Does this mean I can use 3.2 with direct
Kerberos for SSO instead of this POS NTLM auth?

What do you mean by "direct kerberos"?

Squid-3.2 can login to its upstream peers using Kerberos.
All current Squid accept Kerberos via "Negotiate" authentication scheme in HTTP.


Amos


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Samba]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Linux USB]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux