Search squid archive

Re: cache peer communication about HIT/MISS between squid and and non-squid peer

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 02.05.2012 03:12, x-man wrote:
Hello,

I have this question:

If you have squid, that is working as intercept proxy for customers, has parent cache_peer (non-squid), who is not talking ICP or HTCP procols, and
is only dealing with part of the content.

How this parent cache_peer will communicate to the main SQUID about if the request is MISS or HIT, as I want the main squid to apply packet mark for
the HIT traffic.

Or the marking should be done on the cache peer level?

It is best done at the node which has all the information. Things are not really as simple as HIT/MISS.

You will also need TOS pass-thru features enabled in the kernel to propigate the TOS from the squid-upstream packets to the client(s)-squid packets. Although in you could also map the upstream TOS to a netfilter MARK value and pass it through Squid then map it to TOS value on the other connection(s).

Amos



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Samba]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Linux USB]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux