Search squid archive

Re: Roadmap Squid 3.2

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 06.03.2012 02:07, FredB wrote:
Hi all,

Amos, like I said in bug report, Squid 3.2 is very stable with your
last fix, and Alex's patch which is not already included in truck, and
I would like to know the schedule for an official stable release,
approximately of course (before this summer, end of year ?)

The checklist I have to work by is at http://wiki.squid-cache.org/ReleaseProcess#Squid-3 We are looping around at the "freeze" stage (3), waiting to reach 0 major+ bugs before we can start the stable release countdown stages (4+).


We are intending 3.2 to supersede and obsolete all 3.x and 2.x series releases. Which means there are just over 50 bugs rated major or higher which need to be confirmed as fixed in 3.2, or downgraded before 3.2 can start its stability countdown.

A lot of these bugs, particularly 2.x ones, just need somebody to check and verify that the described behaviour is not reproducible in 3.2 anymore. At which point they can be closed against target of 3.2. Another half dozen or so got closed this month, but there are many more to go.

This is a task nearly anyone can do. You just need a network setup similar to the reporters.


Anyone interested in a bug marathon for the next 6-8 weeks?



I had reported some problems with rock store but maybe it can be
consider like an experimental feature for the moment ?

It is experimental until there has been at least one stable cycle of wide use to wrinkle out any minor bugs and edge cases. If the bug you have reported can be considered normal or lower then it will not block the stable release. Keeping in mind that the shared memory change is a feature affecting everybody, so the precise location of the bug impacts its importance a lot.

Amos



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Samba]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Linux USB]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux