Search squid archive

Re: Squid 3.2x: Question about performances in tmpfs

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Thanks Matus

So for you...
It make more sense to increase the "cache_mem" to the maximal possible value instead playing with "cache_dir" ?




Le 02/03/2012 16:55, Matus UHLAR - fantomas a écrit :
On 02.03.12 16:47, David Touzeau wrote:
I have a server with 8Go memory on 4 processors.
Currently my squid proxy 3.2 and my Debian using around 2Go memory in the full production mode.

I would like to try to add a kind of "temporary" cache in tmpfs using around 3.5go of Squid Cache./

That's what memory cache is for... while you loose it after restarting squid, by using tmpfs you'd have duplicate data in memory...

/Did it possible to do this on the squid.conf ? :/

yes.

Means that the tmpfs is monted on /var/cache/squid-tmpfs
Each instance will have 875 Mb on a tmpfs and when the size is full it will automatically start to run the standard cache based on disk.

No, squid can't distinct bedtween multiple cache_dirs like this.
This is just what memory cache is for...

If you have 64bit kernel, you can try increasing cache_mem to e.g. 4GB



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Samba]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Linux USB]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux