Hi,I use 64-bit machine, HP DL380 G7. I thought that it should be better to use tmpfs (part of the memory). After reboot it is clean and empty, squid creates directories again automaticaly.
So you recommend use a few of disk capacity and set caching to memory only ? Thanks J.K. Cituji Matus UHLAR - fantomas <uhlar@xxxxxxxxxxx>:
On 01.12.11 15:05, Josef Karliak wrote:I wanna use tmpfs for squid cache, is 8GB enough or too big ? We've about 3000 computers behind squid, for OS is 16GB sufficient, that's why I used 8GB for squid tmpfs.what is the point of using tmpfs as squid cache? I think using only memory cache would be much more efficient (unless you are running 32-bit squid).-- Matus UHLAR - fantomas, uhlar@xxxxxxxxxxx ; http://www.fantomas.sk/ Warning: I wish NOT to receive e-mail advertising to this address. Varovanie: na tuto adresu chcem NEDOSTAVAT akukolvek reklamnu postu. They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety. -- Benjamin Franklin, 1759
--Ma domena pouziva zabezpeceni a kontrolu SPF (www.openspf.org) a DomainKeys/DKIM (with ADSP) . Pokud mate problemy s dorucenim emailu, zacnete pouzivat metody overeni puvody emailu zminene vyse. Dekuji. My domain use SPF (www.openspf.org) and DomainKeys/DKIM (with ADSP) policy and check. If you've problem with sending emails to me, start using email origin methods mentioned above. Thank you.
---------------------------------------------------------------- This message was sent using IMP, the Internet Messaging Program.
Attachment:
binxGyh7A8OVq.bin
Description: =?iso-8859-2?b?VmX4ZWpu/Q==?= PGP =?iso-8859-2?b?a2zt6A==?=
