Search squid archive

Re: Squid 3.1.x and right configuration parameters for tmpfs 8GB

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 2/12/2011 5:13 a.m., Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
On 01.12.11 15:05, Josef Karliak wrote:
I wanna use tmpfs for squid cache, is 8GB enough or too big ? We've about 3000 computers behind squid, for OS is 16GB sufficient, that's why I used 8GB for squid tmpfs.

what is the point of using tmpfs as squid cache? I think using only memory cache would be much more efficient (unless you are running 32-bit squid).

Yes, consider the purpose of why a disk cache is better than RAM cache: objects are not erased when Squid or the system restarts.

==> tmpfs data is erased when Squid or the system restarts. So why bother?

All you gain from tmpfs is a drop in speed accessing the data, from RAM speeds down to the Disk speeds. Whether it is SSD or HDD that is slower than RAM.

Amos



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Samba]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Linux USB]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux