Search squid archive

Re: 3.2.0.13: FATAL: dying from an unhandled exception: theGroupBSize > 0

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 24/10/11 20:49, David Touzeau wrote:
Le lundi 24 octobre 2011 à 11:49 +1300, Amos Jeffries a écrit :
On 23/10/11 23:49, David Touzeau wrote:
Dear

I'm using the 3.2.0.13-20111022-r11381

When set

worker 2

In squid.conf

Has i have 2 CPUs

Squid did not want to start with the following error

terminate called after throwing an instance of 'TextException'
what():  theGroupBSize>   0
Aborted

http://bugs.squid-cache.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3383


When you have a dedicated server for squid with multiple CPU, is it
mandatory to set worker has the total CPUs installed on the computer ?


No. It is completely optional.

You may have more, or less. More is probably not very useful though, as
each worker still has the old Squid behaviour of scaling itself up to
consume the max cycles of a single CPU to meet traffic load.

workers and SMP support in Squid-3.2 is just a way to simplify the
multi-instance configuration and management.

Amos


You means "a way to simplify the multi-instance configuration"
So each Squid instance must run on a dedicated IP+port ?


Nope. Multiple instances with: shared config, shared listening ports, shared memory cache, aggregated manager reports, aggregated SNMP responses.

Unless you configure otherwise using the ${process_number} macros.

Amos
--
Please be using
  Current Stable Squid 2.7.STABLE9 or 3.1.16
  Beta testers wanted for 3.2.0.13


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Samba]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Linux USB]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux