2011/10/20 Ed W <lists@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>: > On 20/10/2011 18:11, E.S. Rosenberg wrote: >> On the whole I just need the backend to know the username, or what >> 'browsing plan' the session is using, sometimes plans are also >> determined based on src IP (ie. certain stations aren't allowed to >> browse no matter who's logged in, or are supposed to only have access >> to a whitelist even when staff are using them), so I think a >> 'NAT'-like method is most likely what i need. > > Just to highlight a feature that not everyone yet knows about, but in > the 3.2 series there is support for conntrack marking both to copy the > original connection mark to the output and also to mark connections > based on various squid criteria. Conntrack marks don't affect anything > outside of the network stack they are running on (ie next hop knows > nothing), but they can be used to help integrate a firewall to achieve > various clever effects. > > I'm not sure that they help you that much, so this was more to add an > idea on the off chance it helps... At a pinch you can use your firewall > to change IP address or TOS marks to communicate conntrack marks outside > of the box, but it's a bit crude... > > The other thing is that I believe you can use the auth helpers to set > the upstream auth username to be somewhat different to the logged in > user? So I *believe* you can achieve the effect that you can do some > database lookup on users in group X to get a group name "X" and pass > that "X" upstream as the auth user. The point is that you don't need to > use IP as your upstream signaling criteria, you can use the auth user, > but pre-grouped to the service class names that you need. As an > extension to this basic idea I believe you can use the auth helpers to > derive these "usernames" from other criteria such as client IP address, > etc. Does this help? Thank you, yes as far as I understand this is possible, my main question was the performance impact of using usernames/groups instead of IPs, since supposedly squid is a lot better at handling IPs then usernames (although Amos once noted in a previous thread that the speed classifications of the acls aren't written in stone.... Regards, Eli > > Good luck > > Ed W >