Search squid archive

RE: squid 2.7 ... memory leak?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Care to explain how do you able to figure out in that instant?
Anyway after remove ubuntu's libcap2-dev ... leaks gone.

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Amos Jeffries [mailto:squid3@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]
> Sent: Wednesday, October 12, 2011 5:59 AM
> To: squid-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: Re:  squid 2.7 ... memory leak?
> 
>  On Wed, 12 Oct 2011 01:32:00 +0800, jiluspo wrote:
> > (valgrind --tool=memcheck --leak-check=yes squid -Nd1)
> > 2011/10/12 01:25:38| Asking valgrind for memleaks
> > ==9877== 36 bytes in 1 blocks are definitely lost in loss record 606
> > of
> > 1,292
> > ==9877==    at 0x4026864: malloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:236)
> > ==9877==    by 0x407BFD5: cap_init (in /lib/libcap.so.2.20)
> > ==9877==    by 0x407C0FB: cap_get_proc (in /lib/libcap.so.2.20)
> > ==9877==    by 0x80C651B: restoreCapabilities (tools.c:1367)
> > ==9877==    by 0x80C72FA: leave_suid (tools.c:644)
> > ==9877==    by 0x809DB9F: setEffectiveUser (main.c:500)
> > ==9877==    by 0x809E835: main (main.c:549)
> > ==9877==
>  <snip>
> > does anybody care to explain why 36 bytes appeared?
> 
>  This is a leak in your /lib/libcap.so.2.20 library.
> 
>  Amos
> 
> Email secured by Check Point


-- 
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Samba]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Linux USB]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux