Search squid archive

Re: RAID0, LVM or JBOD for best performance squid proxy server?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi Roberto,

Each of the systems you mention will only add an extra layer to the storage solution. Squid (not sure from which version but I am very sure it's main stream on all distros) already has support for multiple cache directories so my suggestion (if you don't need LVM to extend or move physical disks etc) is to make the disks normal mount points. The File system that you use will have to be researched (ext4 vs xfs vs reseirfs vs ...) but I have used ext3/4 with great success (at least enough for me not to complain :) )

See http://wiki.squid-cache.org/BestOsForSquid at the bottom for File Systems etc

The only one that *might* improve things is RAID0 but I can't really see this as squid won't be writing *that* much (on a 100meg connection)

You can also read up on : http://wiki.squid-cache.org/SquidFaq/RAID

Cheers,

Pieter

On 6/08/2011 09:33, rpereyra@xxxxxxxxxxx wrote:

I need to choise the storage type for a squid proxy server with 100Mb/s
traffic.

RAID0, LVM or JBOD

Which is better for performance (don't care the data reliability) ?

This storage is only for the squid cache (not system disk).

I have 3 disk for the array.

I'm using centos 5.

Thanks for any advice.

roberto






[Index of Archives]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Samba]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Linux USB]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux