Thanks for the support. On 24 July 2011 15:34, Markus Moeller <huaraz@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Yes it is safe to ignore the rc=102 error. > > Markus > > "Syed Hussaini" <gowows@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message > news:CAGj7Xbnec8juqsTKySKMKk4L+FhVWYhx+Nb0hmtNOhtf=q9G9A@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx... > yeah Markus I even thought its becuz of that -d option. > > Is it completely safe to ignore this. > > Thanks for your help. > > > > On 21 July 2011 23:26, Markus Moeller <huaraz@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> >> Hi Syed, >> >> -d option is for debug output. >> >> The message >> >> squid_kerb_auth: parseNegTokenInit failed with rc=102 comes from old >> modules >> which use check first for a gssapi token and then for an spngeo token. >> >> >> Regards >> Markus >> >> >> "Syed Hussaini" <gowows@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message >> news:CAGj7XbmB5eZTsuWgd9Q9AkE9UeKgG5YV=t0tQ7udsa3ejn+oxA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx... >>> >>> Hi, >>> >>> I'm using squid version - 2.7 Stable9. My Kerberos authentication is >>> working good as well. I'm receiving this info in my cache.log and just >>> want to confirm that its not worry some. >>> >>> squid_kerb_auth: parseNegTokenInit failed with rc=102 >>> 2011/07/21 10:54:50| squid_kerb_auth: AF >>> >>> >>> oYGgMIGdoAMKAQChCwYJKoZIgvcSAQICooGIBIGFYIGCBgkqhkiG9xIBAgICAG9zMHGgAwIBBaEDAgEPomUwY6ADAgEXolwEWobQXIUTVLEfPspj7ZpRThBLZzVgpamXrYmsjvHrxTIgQUWJ8eH1fQESDD2Zn4hsH2uNucFM2u4aJW10mIZTmLkwcNn0Ufj+QsdeP6XsPtqw7HZDZy4v/vV3lA== >>> kite.k@xxxxxxxxxxxx >>> >>> I get this info for all users who access squid. If someone is using >>> IE 6 then this log doesnt comes up. >>> >>> I have passed -s -d options to squid_kerb_auth in squid.conf, is it >>> becuz of this that I receive above info? >>> >>> >>> Thanks for your help, as always you guys are great helping us. >>> >> >> >> > > >
