2011/6/10 Amos Jeffries <squid3@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>: > On 10/06/11 20:41, Tom Tux wrote: >> >> Mmm... >> >> Now I were able to force squid to die (with gdb): >> >> From cache.log: >> --- SNIP --- >> (squid)(death+0x37)[0x564d37] >> /lib64/libpthread.so.0(+0xf5d0)[0x7f99ebe705d0] >> FATAL: Received Segment Violation...dying. >> 2011/06/10 10:37:28.408| storeDirWriteCleanLogs: Starting... >> 2011/06/10 10:37:28.409| assertion failed: comm.cc:301: "data == >> COMMIO_FD_READCB(fd)" >> --- SNAP --- >> >> But there is no mail sent to the mailaddress defined on the >> "cache_mgr"-directive. I made also a tcpdump on port 25 to check, if >> there even a mail is sent. But no packets on port 25, no mail. >> > > Hmm, > - check for a file /tmp/squid-XXXXXX This file is not existing. I searched the whole system for files like "squid-*", no usefull returns. > - check that the command line: > "$mail_program $cache_mgr </tmp/squid-XXXXXX" > works as per the mail_program directive requirements. This is working well. "mail_program" is set to "mail". And the command "mail test@xxxxxxxxxxx </etc/group" is working well. > - check that your mail system accepts email from squid@$unique_hostname and > squid@$visible_hostname Our mail system is accepting mails from squid in several ways (squid@squidbox, squid@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx). > > ** Email spam filters is one of several reasons why hostname must be a FQDN > with working rDNS. This does not affect mails sending by our squid. Thanks a lot. Tom > > Amos > >> >> 2011/6/10 Helmut Hullen<Hullen@xxxxxxxxxxx>: >>> >>> Hallo, Tom, >>> >>> Du meintest am 10.06.11: >>> >>>> From squid.conf.documented: >>>> -+- SNIP --- >>>> # TAG: cache_mgr >>>> # Email-address of local cache manager who will receive >>>> # mail if the cache dies. The default is "webmaster." >>> >>> "if the cache dies" >>> >>> That's another thing than a dying squid. >>> >>> Viele Gruesse! >>> Helmut >>> > > > -- > Please be using > Current Stable Squid 2.7.STABLE9 or 3.1.12 > Beta testers wanted for 3.2.0.8 and 3.1.12.2 >
