Search squid archive

Re: Persistent Connections to Parent Proxy

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 29/04/11 07:28, Jenny Lee wrote:



----------------------------------------
Date: Fri, 29 Apr 2011 01:12:55 +1200
From: squid3@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
To: squid-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re:  Persistent Connections to Parent Proxy

On 28/04/11 20:19, Mathias Fischer wrote:
Hi,

We use squid together with a content scanner connected as parent proxy
(cache_peer parent) with none of them caching any content. When
upgrading from squid 2.7 to 3.1, we observed an increased number of TCP
connections between squid and its parent. I analysed the traffic between
squid and the parent proxy (for both squid versions), and found (among
some differences in HTTP version and (Proxy-)Connection header) that the

Proxy-Connection: has never been a registered header suitable for
transmission. Squid-3 was mistakenly made to send it for a while instead
of just accept it. That bug has been fixed in recent releases.
Only Connection: shod be sent over the wire.

usage of persistent connections has changed. In squid 2.7, a persistent
connection to the parent proxy is shared for multiple origin servers,
while in squid 3.1, there is at least one connection per origin server.
Obviously, this results in a much higher total number of connections.

Hmm, I thought we corrected that the same way in both 3.1 and 2.7.
3.0 and 2.6 certainly had that behaviour.

Current 2.7 and 3.1 should have (peer_IP, domain_name) as the pconn key.
There can be multiple duplicates of course up to as many as needed to
handle peak load (moderated by how fast the peer closes them).


Is there a possibility to influence this behaviour? To me, it looks like
this is related to the introduced Connection Pinning [1] feature.

Pinning links one server FD per client connection, kind of an
independent and special type of persistence. It should not be showing
this behaviour, though yes it also will cause a multitude of server
connections.


As a workaround, I see the option to reduce the number of open
persistent connections through pconn_timeout, but this will have an
impact on other connections as well which could reduce performance.

We have a re-structuring if the conn and pconn handling coming to 3.2
shortly (a few weeks) which removes the domain name from the pconn key.

We have the same problem in 3.2.0.1 and 3.2.0.7

Is this planned for 3.2.0.8?

Possibly, hopefully, depends on how much free time I have.

Amos
--
Please be using
  Current Stable Squid 2.7.STABLE9 or 3.1.12
  Beta testers wanted for 3.2.0.7 and 3.1.12.1


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Samba]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Linux USB]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux