Thanks I'll try patching kernel then.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Andrew Beverley" <andy@xxxxxxxxxxx>
To: "jiluspo" <jiluspo@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Sunday, April 24, 2011 10:54 PM
Subject: Re: TOS from remote to squid(2 series)
On Sun, 2011-04-24 at 22:43 +0800, jiluspo wrote:
>
>> lastly, what about its performance degradation(req/sec and service
>> time)
>> if
>> we add this feature.
>
> Performance degradation should be minimal, although I haven't run any
> benchmarks.
theoretically, which would run faster if we user mark and patched zph?
Patching for tos, as you won't have the overhead of converting a tos
into a mark and back again. Also, I guess that getting a tos value
requires less processor overhead than getting a mark.
Andy
--
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.
