I more thank Amos, but if anyone has any other tips, information, help me 2011/4/8 Amos Jeffries <squid3@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>: > On 09/04/11 02:49, igor rocha wrote: >> >> ? >> >> 2011/4/8 igor rocha<igorlogos@xxxxxxxxx>: >>> >>> Hello, >>> I know that does not formulate the right question, I am Brazilian and >>> not mastered English well, but talk about commonly used metrics to >>> measure the effectiveness of the cache and the amount of bandwidth >>> saved is hit ratio, defined as the percentage of requests that are >>> satisfied by the proxy as cache hits.Show me the average percentage of >>> index pages that are not cached,a paper. >>> >>> understand? > > Ah. I think so. > > I'm not aware of any papers on that. It is highly variable between networks. > We do have two general "rule-of-thumbs"; > * that reverse-proxy (CDN) see hit ratios usually around 80%-99% for a > website. > * that forward-proxy (ISP) see hit rations between 25% and 45%. > > with variance outside of those ranges for older Squid versions and poorly > written websites. > > This is general-knowledge built up from years of small talks with people > looking at and discussion of their cache ratios. Nothing published exactly. > > We have in recent years attempted to collects statistics on these. Which can > be found at http://wiki.squid-cache.org/KnowledgeBase/Benchmarks along with > the methodology used for collection. > > Amos > >>> 2011/4/8 Amos Jeffries wrote: >>>> >>>> On 08/04/11 02:48, igor rocha wrote: >>>>> >>>>> Hello Gentlemen, >>>>> could anyone tell me what percentage of sites that are required for >>>>> the cache and actually go into the cache, can be an article that >>>>> talksabout it, something that helps me to have concrete statistical >>>>> data. >>>> >>>> Please explain your meaning of "required for the cache". >>>> >>>> 100% of squid cacheable sites get cached. Admin often force>100% to be >>>> cached. >>>> >>>> I suspect you mean something else though. >>>> >>>> Amos >>>> -- >>>> Please be using >>>> Current Stable Squid 2.7.STABLE9 or 3.1.12 >>>> Beta testers wanted for 3.2.0.6 >>>> >>> > > > -- > Please be using > Current Stable Squid 2.7.STABLE9 or 3.1.12 > Beta testers wanted for 3.2.0.6 >
