Search squid archive

Re: Squid3 with ClamAV and Contentfilter

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, 04 Apr 2011 17:29:10 +0200, Sebastian Schnur wrote:
Hello list, I'm new here. :)

I will aproax aproach the status of an it specialist in system
integration in June this year.

So I have to do a project: Setting up a proxy server for filtering
(AV, Content) the internet (surf)-traffic.

We currently have squid 2.7 (debian squeeze) installed. I'm
suggesting to replace it with squid3 with c-icap and clamav. I read
about some facts, that users have to click on a link on a webpage when
they want to download a file, because first of all squid forwards the
request via its icap-client through the icap-server to clamav and
clamav. Is this still the current status? Can I adapt my configuration
to do it like HTTP Antivirus Proxy (havp) does (sends the
response-file directly to the client)?

Where did you get that "fact"? I don't recall that being true.

* The old clamav integration provided the alternative URL automatically in the background and the browser would redirect to it without the user needing to do anything. * the ICAP filters mid-stream similar to havp. The early clamav server implementation did have issues around delaying the download while it pulled in and scanned the whole object. Not sure if that has been resolved or not.

(I do not use clamav, so may be wrong.)

NP: When you go to squid3 you may want to use the 3.1.11 or later packages available in the Debian sid repositories. The squeeze package has a few annoying issues that do not qualify for fixing under the Debian policy.

Amos



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Samba]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Linux USB]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux