Search squid archive

Re: oa in 3.2?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Subject: Re: oa in 3.2?
From: Amos Jeffries <squid3@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 29 Mar 2011 02:45:13 +1300
In-reply-to: <BAY147-w3592917C4564A5F501C379CCBA0@xxxxxxx>
References: <BAY147-w3592917C4564A5F501C379CCBA0@xxxxxxx>
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.9.2.14) Gecko/20110223 Thunderbird/3.1.8

On 29/03/11 01:31, Jenny Lee wrote:


Hello Squid folks,

When are we going to see "oa" in logformat in 3.2?


Thanks for the reminder. The next 3.2 should have it.

Amos
--
Please be using
  Current Stable Squid 2.7.STABLE9 or 3.1.11
  Beta testers wanted for 3.2.0.5

Follow-Ups:
- Re: oa in 3.2?
  - From: Amos Jeffries

References:
- oa in 3.2?
  - From: Jenny Lee

Prev by Date: oa in 3.2?
Next by Date: Re: oa in 3.2?
Previous by thread: oa in 3.2?
Next by thread: Re: oa in 3.2?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Linux Audio Users] [Samba] [Big List of Linux Books] [Linux USB] [Yosemite News]

Powered by Linux