Re: Re: squid 3.2.0.5 even slower than squid 3.1 and doesn't work with workers >1

[david@xxxxxxx]

On Mon, 21 Mar 2011, david@xxxxxxx wrote:

> Date: Mon, 21 Mar 2011 17:16:08 -0700 (PDT)
> From: david@xxxxxxx
> To: squid-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: Re:  Re: squid 3.2.0.5 even slower than squid 3.1 and
>     doesn't work with workers >1
>
> On Mon, 21 Mar 2011, david@xxxxxxx wrote:
>
> > On Mon, 21 Mar 2011, david@xxxxxxx wrote:
> >
> > > resending without the attachments since this doesn't appear to have gotten 
> > > through to the list. if this gets through I'll reply with them.
> >
> > ok, apparently the list doesn't like attachments
>
> it also has a size restriction low enough that the logs exceed it.
>
> I'll try with them as zipped attachments and see if that goes through.
>
> if not, please let me know who to send them to for more information.
>
> David Lang

<<attachment: workers.log.zip>>